The
Union and Aftermath
Despite
the fact that the 1798 Rebellion had ended in utter failure,
it had nevertheless made the British cabinet very much aware
of the Irish Question. William Pitt had already conceived
the idea of abolishing the Irish Parliament completely and
uniting it with the British parliament in what would be
termed The Union with Britain. Lord Cornwallis
had also been sent to Ireland as Lord Lieutenant and Commander-in-Chief
of the army, with a dual purpose in mind ... to quell the
Rebellion and to pave the way for the proposed Act of Union.
With the first of those tasks successfully completed he
could now turn his full attention to the second.
First efforts at getting the Irish aristocracy and members
of the Irish parliament to agree to a complete Union with
Britain met with complete failure, but Cornwallis now began
to employ other methods. With Lord Castlereagh, the Chief
Secretary, taking the lead in what only can be described
as despicable practices, votes were bought, while titles
and bribes were offered in lavish amounts to those who might
be likely to vote against the motion when it came before
them. In due course, this disgraceful practice proved hugely
successful. The recipients of titles and bribes were even
described by Cornwallis as the most corrupt people
under heaven. All objections to the proposed Union
gradually evaporated.
Under the terms of the Act, the Irish Parliament would be
abolished and, in future, Ireland would be represented by
one hundred members in the British House of Parliament and
by 32 peers in the House of Lords. The vote was eventually
carried on August 1st 1800, and the Act of Union
then came into force on the first day of the new century,
the 1st of January 1801. The members of the Irish House
of Parliament accordingly went down in world history as
the only parliamentarians ever to have voted themselves
out of a job. A new cross (the cross of St.Patrick)
was added to the Union Flag and the House of
Parliament in College Green, Dublin, became vacant. (It
is currently the Bank of Ireland).
Pitt and Castlereagh had also won middle-class Catholic
support for the Act of Union by promising that, if passed,
Catholic Emancipation would quickly follow. The majority
of the leading Catholic clerics thus advocated the passing
of the Act, but they were sadly disappointed when all efforts
at introducing a Catholic Emancipation Act were very soon
forgotten. The Catholic Church in Ireland justifiably felt
both betrayed and humiliated. In addition, promises and
guarantees that Irish trade and industry would also flourish
under the new act, also proved to be completely groundless
and, from now on, the commercial and industrial life of
the country went into serious decline.
Dublin city also ceased to be the metropolis where the great
landowners had their lovely homes, as the majority of these
now moved to London, which, in turn, became the principal
social and political centre, while Dublin gradually went
into decline, the beautiful buildings eventually being converted
into tenements for a rapidly expanding population of the
so-called lower classes. This exodus of the
rich also gave rise to absentee landlordism,
which would cause so much strife and bitterness in the Ireland
for the next hundred years. These absentee landlords appointed
agents to collect their rents and taxes from them, and these
latter appointees proved so despicable that there was constant
friction, even warfare, between them and the unfortunate
tenants whom they pressurised so ruthlessly for the payment
of rents and taxes. This even resulted in occasional assassinations
of some such agents throughout the country.
Despite the apparent obliteration of the United Irishmen
and the introduction of the Act of Union, the spirit of
republicanism and revolution remained strong, especially
in Dublin, where a young lawyer named Robert Emmet now came
to the fore. He was the younger brother of Thomas Addis
Emmet, one of the leaders of the Dublin United Irishmen
and secretary of their supreme council in the city.
Born in Dublin in 1778, Robert Emmet was educated at Trinity
College, went to France in 1800 and later, unsuccessfully,
tried to persuade the emperor Napolcon to send yet another
French expedition to Ireland. Arriving back in Ireland in
1802 he planned a rebellion of his own, convinced that the
surrounding counties would respond to his call to arms.
Unfortunately, those surrounding counties failed to respond,
while an accidental explosion at one of his depots in the
city alerted the authorities to the danger of yet another
uprising and he was forced to go ahead with the revolution
earlier then he had planned. On July 23rd 1803 he sallied
into Thomas Street in the city, at the head of his small
group of spirited revolutionaries, intending to attack Dublin
Castle. He was, unfortunately, joined by a number of undesirables
whom he could well have done without, and the insurrection
ended in total confusion, especially when the lord chief
justice Lord Kilwarden and his nephew were dragged from
their carriage and callously murdered.
Emmet escaped, however, and hid for a period in the Wicklow
mountains, but then moved back to Harolds Cross, Dublin,
in order to be close to the girl he was engaged to, Sarah
Curran. His housekeeper Anne Devlin was jailed in Kilmainham
and tortured in an effort to get her to tell where her master
was hiding but the brave girl steadfastly refused. Eventually,
Emmet was captured on August 25th 1803, tried for treason,
found guilty and hanged. His speech from the dock, in which
he asked that his epitaph should not be written until Ireland
had attained complete freedom, has frequently been used
as a rallying cry for Irish republicans down through the
years.
Robert Emmets love affair with Sarah Curran is recalled
in Thomas Moores lovely melody She is far from
the land where her young hero sleeps while Emmet himself
has always been held in the highest esteem as one of Irelands
finest heroes. His youthfulness made him an endearing character
to all, while his truly remarkably courage became an inspiration
and example to those who came after him.
In Ulster that same year (1803), Thomas Russell, who had
returned from France in July with the disappointing news
that Napoleon would not be sending any further expeditions
to Ireland, led an abortive uprising near Loughinisland
in Co. Down but, like Emmets effort in Dublin, it
ended in total failure. Russell was captured, tried for
treason and then hanged at Downpatrick jail. His memory
is celebrated in the lovely poem The Man From God
Knows Where.
The abject failure of the British government to grant Catholic
Emancipation, as was promised in the articles of the Act
of Union, now led to further and even more bitter sectarian
strife. Secret societies flourished and new ones were founded,
with the Defenders gradually merging into the
Ribbonmen to combat the outrages continually
being committed in the name of the Orange Order, especially
in Ulster. The Catholics, even those who had supported the
Union, now turned completely against the Act, and the fight
to be admitted to parliament began in real earnest.
A new power was now appearing on the Catholic side, however
who would transform the situation completely. He was a landowner
and lawyer from Co.Kerry, named Daniel OConnell. Born
on August 6th 1775 near Cahirciveen, he studied law in London
and was called to the Irish bar in 1798. He would later
become the first of the great 19th century parliamentary
leaders and would also be instrumental in raising the Irish
people from the gutter and turning them into a force to
be reckoned with, in both British and Irish politics. Justifiably,
he would be nicknamed The Liberator by a very
grateful Irish peasantry.
A vigorous opponent of the concept of physical force, having
been an eye-witness to some of the excesses perpetrated
on the continent following the French Revolution, while
he was at college in St.Omer and Douai, he spoke out strongly
against the United Irishmen and the whole idea of revolution.
He even marched with the company of Trinity College militia
against the Robert Emmet insurgents in Dublin in 1803. He
was also a native Irish speaker, but he repeatedly refused
to use the Irish language, even in his meetings with the
people of the Gaeltacht areas of the West during the 1840s.
Despite all this, he would have an amazing influence on
the Irish people in their struggle against the British,
particularly by his denunciation of the Act of Union and
in his efforts to attain Catholic Emancipation. Towards
this latter end he set about bringing together the priests,
the Catholic middle classes and the peasantry and forging
them into one strong unit that would very successfully agitate
for the removal of the last of the Penal Laws and attaining
their basic civil right to be represented by one of their
own religion sitting in parliament.
|